What Is A TRUE Portfolio?…and how do I get one?

Tags

#180DaysCount, alternative assessment, authentic classrooms, Good Cause Exemptions, High stakes testing, Portfolio, Portfolio assessment, real learning, real teaching, Third grade, Third Grade Promotion

When a third grade student in Florida fails the FSA, or opts out of the FSA, they will need a Good Cause Exemption to be promoted to the fourth grade. Parents will need to work with their child’s school to make that happen. The Alternative Assessments allowed by the State for a Good Cause Exemption can be another test, but it can also be a portfolio; a TRUE portfolio, not a battery of secret mini-tests from Florida’s Item Bank and Test Platform.

Kevin Foster is a Lake County father and Administrator for Opt Out Lake County, who opts his child out of the FSA. As a result of advocating for Lake County to include a true portfolio in the district’s Student Progression Plan (SPP), the Lake County SPP now includes language (just one phrase) that supports the use of a true portfolio, for a Good Cause Exemption. A TRUE portfolio is a collection of your child’s work throughout the school year. 

Some districts already include this language in their SPP, but some do not. Some districts, which have true portfolio language (which comes directly from Florida Statute) in their SPP, do not comply with that SPP. Only parents can hold their feet to the fire.

Here’s what Kevin shared:

After several unproductive meetings with various Lake County School District administrative officials, my wife and I were invited by Superintendent Kornegay to sit down for a discussion regarding the Portfolio option as a Good Cause Exemption from 3rd Grade Mandatory Retention.  We discussed a wide range of topics including participating, but minimally, in the FSA, DOE Rule 6A-1.094221, and the results of the (then recently decided) lawsuit by 3rd Grade parents against the State and several school districts.

We explained our view that opting out, or minimal participation (signing the test and pushing it away without answering any questions), satisfied the statutory requirement that all students participate in FSA testing.  

We also pointed out that there was a key part of Rule 6A-1.094221 that was seemingly being ignored by everyone, which stated that, “chapter and unit tests from the district’s/school’s adopted core reading curriculum could be used as part of the portfolio.”

We also explained our view, that it was a waste of precious instructional time to remove a child from the classroom in order to give them a battery of mini-tests from Florida’s Item Bank and Test Platform.

And, we pointed out that the (then) recent Appeals Court ruling against parents answered a key question about who has the final say on promotion to 4th grade.  The Court said it was the Superintendent (not the FLDOE).  We explained that this meant that the process was intended to be a bottom-up thing, rather than a top-down thing, and that teachers and principals should be allowed to make a recommendation for promotion if they believe the student deserves to be promoted.

At the end of that meeting, Supt. Kornegay asked me directly, “What do you want me to do?”

I replied, “I want you to put this specific language about the portfolio from FLDOE Rule 6A-1.094221 into the Lake County 3rd Grade Progression Plan.” 

It said (referring to the portfolio Good Cause Exemption), “Such evidence could be selected from… chapter and unit tests from the district’s/schools’s adopted core reading curriculum.”  This may seem like a small thing, but it’s not.

The very next time that the Progression Plan was up for a vote before the School Board, that language was included in the draft version, and the Board voted to approve it.  It’s been there ever since.  (You can find it on Page 36 of the Lake County Progression Plan which can be downloaded here.

You can also find it on pages 2-3 of the FLDOE Promotion to Grade 4 Technical Assistance Paper

Why is this important? 

Well…  the Chapter and Unit Tests are the work that your child does throughout the school year.  It’s a true portfolio.  If your child does well on those chapter and unit tests throughout the year, there should be no (or very little) need to remove them from class to create a portfolio based on the Florida Item Bank and Test Platform.  Some of those Item Bank mini-tests may still be necessary in order to round out your child’s portfolio if they don’t have all 3 examples of each of the 22 standards.  (Also, keep in mind that they must score at least a 70 for each of those to count as a valid example.)

What if your school insists that they will not start a portfolio for your child until AFTER the FSA has been administered? 

As I see it, you have two options.  You can either educate yourself about the standards and attempt to collect the portfolio items yourself as they come home from school with your child, or…  you could lean on this specific note from the top of Page 37 in the Progression Plan. It’s also in the FLDOE TAP with Rule 6A-1.094221 and Florida Statute cited.

“Note: A parent of a student in grade 3 who is identified anytime during the year as being at risk of retention may request that the school immediately begin the portfolio assessment process.”

If you write a letter to your school principal announcing your intention to opt-out/minimally participate in the FSA, that act alone should immediately “identify” your child as “being at risk of retention,” since retention is mandatory without a passing grade on the FSA. I cannot guarantee that this part of the process will work, but if you think about it, it makes a certain amount of sense.  Be prepared to fight for that “at risk” identification. 

The sooner you write that letter, the better.

If your child’s teacher agrees to develop a portfolio, you should request to examine it from time to time to make sure it’s being maintained. Parents in other districts have been told that a portfolio would be developed, only to find at the end of the year that it was not. You do not want to get to the end of the year and not have that portfolio documenting your child’s proficiency of the standards.

You should also be prepared to compile the portfolio yourself.  If you find yourself in this position, you’ll need to make sure that every “chapter and unit test” which is graded gets sent home to you for your collection.  Every one of those “chapter and unit tests” should include a notation regarding which standards are being assessed.  Note also that a single question may provide for more than one example, and for more than one standard. (Remember, 3 examples of each of the 22 standards are required.)  The sooner you get started compiling the portfolio, the better.

One final reminder:  I cannot guarantee that this will work.  But, it is the process that I envisioned when I asked Supt. Kornegay to add that specific language to our progression plan.  

Remember that opting out is an act of civil disobedience intended to challenge/change the current system. It requires courage and tenacity, but…. if successful, you will have blazed a trail for others to follow.

Good luck.
___________

“The statewide, standardized English Language Arts assessment is not the sole determiner of promotion and that additional evaluations, portfolio reviews, and assessments are available to the child to assist parents and the school district in knowing when a child is reading at or above grade level and ready for grade promotion.”
(Section 1008.25(5)(c)6, F.S.)

RESOURCES
– Sample Letter to Request a 3rd Grade Portfolio
– Statutory Third Grade Portfolio Checklist
– Student Portfolio Puts Assessment Where It Belongs… With Teachers
– Third Grade Portfolio Checklist – Working Document (updated 8/22/18)
– Third Grade Portfolio Instructions 
– Special Opt Out group for Third Grade Parents – for help, peer support and strategies to find fair and useful assessment for promotion

My Child Failed The FSA. Now what?

Tags

#180DaysCount, alternative assessment, developmentally Appropriate Practice, good cause exemption, harmful educational practices, Portfolio, Portfolio assessment, promotion by report card, Promotion to 4th grade, Third grade, Third Grade FSA

by Sandy Stenoff

Teachers’ comment after release of 3rd Grade FSA scores

PARENTS, if your child failed the FSA and you’ve just found the Opt Out network and haven’t read anything about this until now… it will be up to YOU to fight retention.  You can.

Get out your highlighter… You have some reading to do. 

This is the guiding document from the Florida Department of Education for promotion or for fighting retention:

Link: FLDOE – Promotion to Grade 4 Technical Assistance Paper (TAP) – 10/27/17

• EVERY third grade parent should familiarize themselves with this document and work through it with the teacher and school to develop a Good Cause Exemption. This is the most current FLDOE Technical Assistance Paper (TAP) on promotion to 4th grade. It spells out the approved alternative assessments and scores required for a Good Cause Exemption. 
• If you have received a retention notice, this is the document to guide your actions toward promotion. USE IT. Print it out and share it with the school. They’ve probably never seen it.
• Please read it from beginning to end.
• PRINT THIS DOCUMENT AND TAKE IT TO YOUR MEETING AT SCHOOL. Use it in discussing anything to do with third grade right now.
  
• Also find your current district Student Progression Plan.
  It’s on the internet. The whole progression plan could be more than 100 pages, so locate and print just the section on Third Grade promotion, retention and Good Cause Exemptions. Take this to your meeting as well. 
  
• These documents should be required reading for every third grade teacher and elementary school principal. It’s unacceptable if they don’t know. Parents should not have to provide this info to schools. But if they do, it’s here.

READ THIS: Opting Out Of The Third Grade FSA
Shareable link: http://bit.ly/3rdGradeOptOut

AND THIS: Third Grade Opt Out Toolbox
Shareable link: http://bit.ly/Gr3OptOutToolbox

Read the various sections on Portfolio and “Navigating the Threat of Retention.” There’s a LOT of information and you may be overwhelmed, especially if you’ve just found us. Read it all.

No school has an incentive to retain a child, especially one who is not deficient. Most kids will get through this with a Good Cause Exemption. You’re getting mandatory notifications from school now. They are covering their butts. AND YOUR KID’S. SO WORK WITH THEM. NICELY.

That said, YOU have options:

Send an email today to your principal:

“In response to this notice about possible retention, I am requesting a copy of (Name)’s complete academic record, to include all assessments done with results for this school year.

Does (name) have a documented reading deficiency and if so, what is the specific basis for that determination? Because of the timeframe, please provide the copies on Tuesday, so that I can review them before the last day of school, Wednesday.

Thank you in advance for your kind assistance.
Sincerely,…..

To compile a portfolio, collect all of your child’s work from the school year and organize it by date order in a 3-ring binder, separated by subject – Math, Language Arts, Science and Social Studies. Science and Social Studies can be used to cover the non-fiction reading requirements.

IF you have enough of your child’s classwork to show that he passed the required standards, you may be able to compile a portfolio that can be certified by a teacher or principal as meeting the required standards for promotion to 4th grade.

The requirements are specific:
– Third Grade Portfolio Instructions 
– Third Grade Portfolio Checklist  – Working Document (updated 8/22/18)
– Promoted to 4th Grade Without a Test Score – a teacher’s account of his own child’s opt out and promotion.

If the school or the district refuse to assess your child’s portfolio, you can withdraw your child from school, register him as a home school student, get his student portfolio of classwork certified as passing by a certified teacher and re-enroll in 4th grade. If not… keep reading. 

(NOTE: if your child is in a charter school or a magnet outside of your school zone, your child could lose their place if you withdraw him/her.)

You also COULD try to push the district to promote based on the report card – which the Florida Statute allows …


But THAT would require you suing the district to comply. Can you say “attorney fees”?

State-approved list of alternative assessments. Student must pass just one assessment to earn a Good Cause Exemption for promotion to the 4th grade.

From the list above, some districts allow the use of any of the assessments listed. Other districts limit which assessments may be used. This should be listed on the district’s current Student Progression Plan (SPP), searchable on the internet.

Most teachers like the SAT10, because it accurately represents the standards taught and does not include trick questions and test distractors. It’s a good, fair assessment with shorter reading passages, more age-appropriate vocabulary and most kids do well on it.

IF you request the SAT10 and your district won’t administer it, you can ask HOW they would accept it from an outside testing company. Hernando County accepts SAT10 results from an outside testing company. Here is a letter that you can share with your school:

Hernando County Schools letter about SAT10

If a student needs some time to prepare for the SAT10, parents can order the workbook online, or they can help their child online.
You can check out the SAT10 here: www.setontesting.com

Some helpful information from teachers:

SUMMER SCHOOL
Some schools are telling parents that they can only administer the SAT10 AFTER summer school. The State does not require summer school before the SAT10 may be administered. So if parents want the SAT10, they will have to ask the school or district to show where it is written that they must complete summer school first.


There are some students, who would benefit from summer school before going on to 4th grade. Some programs are terrific, with low student:teacher ratios and fun built in. Hopefully they’ll even get to read some real books!

There are kids who would be better off going to 4th grade and getting the appropriate support then. 

There are also kids who can read just fine and just need to pass a test to satisfy the system.

But seriously. They don’t call it summer SCHOOL for nothing. It’s still MORE SCHOOL, with the specific purpose of getting them ready to pass yet one more test. If their reading skills improve as well, we’ll call that a freebie.

PROVISIONAL PROMOTION TO 4TH GRADE
Please read:
– Retained? You can go to 4th grade… sort of…maybe.

Parents need to do what is best for their child, but they need to be fully informed in order to know what they can and cannot ask for.

If the school isn’t going to help them to be informed, then for the sake of their child, they will need to do it for themselves.

 

Retention, Remediation or Poor Class Placement: What’s a parent to do?

Tags

#180DaysCount, class placement, classrooms, developmentally Appropriate Practice, FSA, Opt Out, remediation, Retention

by Sandy Stenoff 

PARENTS can grant consent – or withhold it.

Test scores are in. And the letters are going out.

From a parent:

“I am so upset. Please can you help me? My daughter is going into 8th grade and has received Straight A’s in all her advanced classes for 2 years in a row and in 5th grade. She also takes high school courses with A’s. She got a 2 on Reading FSA and now they are telling me she has to take Reading which will remove one of her high school classes in 8th grade. I never want her to take this test again. How do I get her out of Intensive Reading so she can take her high school electives and her Honors Algebra?

I feel that I should have known about opting her out. She came home the first day of the Writing FSA an absolute wreck. I will never put her through this again. After the 3 hours of FSA testing, her classes gave work, reading assignments, projects and more tests. It was an awful week returning from Spring Break and it took a toll on her.“

Since test scores were released a few weeks ago, The Opt Out Florida Network has received many such messages from parents from all over the state, some far more egregious.

Remember, you are the parent and the final authority for your child’s education rests with YOU.

FSA scores were released on June 15, 2018 (here, here and here) and many parents are being informed that their child is being denied electives or class placement because he/she received a low FSA score. Some parents are being informed now. Others will learn of this at the beginning of the school year with surprise schedule changes. Students in Honors or AP classes, simultaneously placed in Intensive Reading, sacrificing electives (Art, Orchestra, foreign language or computers, etc.) based on FSA scores. Makes sense to you, right? Nope, me neither…

This is school or district policy, not state law and parents CAN challenge it. Be informed and take action.

The Florida Department of Education (FLDOE) is clear (bold and underlined for emphasis):

“…the statewide, standardized English Language Arts assessment is not the sole determiner of promotion and that additional evaluations, portfolio reviews, and assessments are available to the child to assist parents and the school district in knowing when a child is reading at or above grade level and ready for grade promotion.” (https://info.fldoe.org/docushare/dsweb/Get/Document-7208/dps-2014-128.pdf – Page 6) 

There are many more moving parts to this issue of poor class placement. For one thing, IF there is a deficiency, the school is obligated to provide written notice to parents earlier in the school year.  The school cannot simply remediate a child because of a single test score at the end of the year. There are other data that must be considered in that decision. If a child is actually deficient in reading, that deficiency must be identified and addressed. So parents should never just take anyone’s word that a test score says “your child must be remediated.”

There are only two scenarios:
1.  The child DOES NOT have a reading deficiency, just a low test score.
The parent’s input must be considered. If the school recommends remediation, the
parent may decline.
2.  The child DOES have a reading deficiency. The deficiency must be identified and
addressed with parents. There is a specific evaluation process that must happen.
Don’t let them off the hook.

When the school tells you that they have no choice because it’s the law, ask them POLITELY to provide it in writing – the law – the statute – or the district policy.
They will not. IT DOES NOT EXIST.

For those students with no FSA score because they opted out, there is no actual basis for these decisions, but that is no guarantee that districts and schools will not try to remediate these students – whether out of retaliation or because they are misinformed, it’s still wrong. Someone thinks this is what they are supposed to do. Children’s education is suffering because of this misinformation being passed down from school districts to schools. Without FSA scores, schools should rely on report cards and teacher recommendations for proper placement.

It’s summer and you can prepare now by becoming informed. Your child is relying on you to know your stuff. No one else is looking out for them. It’s up to YOU.

Informed parents do not need to be afraid or intimidated. Just persistent.

Here are some tools that have been proven to work – there is no magic here, just official district or state documents. In the Opt Out movement, these are our “power tools.” Use them to provide your child the education to which they are entitled.

Here is a form used in Broward County.

Other districts have similar forms, but in case your district tells you they don’t have one, you can use this language from the Broward form in your own email. I can recall no instances where a parent has challenged class placement based on test scores and has not been successful. You may need to be persistent, but you can do it!

“I understand why the course recommendation was made; however, I wish to have my child placed in (desired elective) instead of Intensive Reading. I am willing to provide the academic and emotional support my child may need while participating in this course.

 

Thank you very much for your concern. Looking forward to a great school year!

 

Sincerely…..”

Or you can simply state:

“I wish to have my child placed in his chosen elective(s), (list them here) and I am willing to provide the academic and emotional support my child may need while participating in this course.”

Use the information in this post with your child’s school if you need to. Send them the links to the material from the DOE.

Remediation based on FSA scores has not been a state requirement since 2015 and it has been successfully CHALLENGED many times.

Information on House Bill 7069 May 18, 2015 – Slide 11

Information on House Bill 7069 May 18, 2015 – Slide 12

From the Orlando Sentinel on HB7069 (May 8 2015): 

“HB 7069… ended the requirement for automatic “intensive” reading or math classes for students who scored below “satisfactory” on the tests, or less than a 3 on the 5-level exams. The Florida Department of Education in a memo today outlined the change for school superintendents. Schools, the memo said, must still provide help to students who struggle on the exams — and that could mean remedial classes.

But they can “make decisions that are in the best interest of each student regarding course enrollment and instructional support,” wrote Chancellor Hershel Lyons. Educators have long worried that the required remedial classes eliminated electives for many students, robbing them of a chance to take courses of interest or that might set them on a career path.”

You can read the entire article here.
Please read the memo in Resources below.

THIRD GRADE
Even for Third Grade promotion, there are Good Cause Exemptions spelled out clearly in the FLDOE’s Promotion to Grade 4 Technical Assistance Paper (TAP) – to avoid retention and to progress without remediation. For more information on avoiding retention, please click here =>>: Third Grade Opt Out Toolbox.

If a child is to be retained legitimately, much more is required of the school than for the child to simply “do it all over again.” In the rare instance that a student actually needs to be retained, it should be negotiated with the input of the child’s educational team of parents, teacher, guidance counselor and principal, and with parental consent – there are strict guidelines that must be adhered to and parents should be aware of those as well. This information is also contained in the same TAP, under
SERVICES FOR STUDENTS RETAINED IN GRADE 3 – Pg 3
MID-YEAR PROMOTION OF RETAINED GRADE 3 STUDENTS – Pg 4

Within the Florida education statutes, each school district has some flexibility for how to implement the law. Class placements and student progression are ultimately regulated by your school district’s “Student Progression Plan”. This document is the road map to help you navigate district policy for your child throughout the school year.

To be your child’s best advocate, you should familiarize yourself with the information pertinent to your child before school starts back in the fall.

To find yours, you can simply search the internet.
Example: Google “Seminole County student progression plan 2018”
This is what comes up: https://www.scps.k12.fl.us/_resources/documents/StudentProgressionPlan.pdf

For more on challenging class placement: Parents, YOU are the Boss… and you can say NO.

IMPORTANT – Remember to communicate with your school by e-mail. It is a written record, a timeline and documentation of your efforts to remedy the school’s mistake. Save it. It cannot be deleted by the school and they cannot say they didn’t receive your e-mail. If you use the information provided here and the school is still not cooperating with your request to correct class placement, forward your e-mail correspondence to your school board members and your superintendent and ask for help. CC your local education reporter. Not kidding.

One last note – Give the school staff the benefit of the doubt. Most schools are being given incorrect or insufficient information by the districts. Most will never have seen the information you are provided here. Yes, they should know better. Don’t waste your energy “being right.” Provide them the information so that they can do better for your child and move on.

Save your energy. We have bigger fights ahead.

This misuse of test data, especially when students have a clear record of performing well in school, should be a reminder to all parents that a low test score is always more harmful to children than no test score. All of this underscores just how invalid these tests are, giving no credit to teachers and students for a whole year of hard work teaching and learning.

For our public schools to return to common sense, and genuine teaching and learning, parents must stop feeding the testing machine and do the one thing we have the power to do. Deny the data used to harm our children, our teachers and our schools. Opt Out.

Please share this information. Someone you know needs it.

____________________

RESOURCES

FLDOE Memo May 8 2015 Student Progression: New Requirements, Changes and Continued Requirement
Promotion to Grade 4 Technical Assistance Paper
FLDOE – Secondary Student Progression FAQ 2017-2018
Information on House Bill 7069 (updated May 18, 2015)
BCPS – Course Recommendation Override Form
SCPS STUDENT PROGRESSION PLAN 2018-2019

Clearing Hurdle #1 to Protect ALL 3rd Graders

Tags

#180DaysCount, retention lawsuit, Third Grade lawsuit

The Bottom Line Right Up Front:
Hurdle #1: We have 2 days to help raise $1200 to get the plaintiffs to the Florida Supreme Court. There will be other hurdles to overcome, but they have to get over this one first. The families will cross the finish line when they prevail in court, but they’ve got to get to court. And they need YOUR help to do it. If you’d like to skip right to the donate section, scroll on down to “3 ways to donate”!

Nearly a whole school year has already passed. The parents would not allow their children to be retained and the children are either in private schools or homeschooling. The families are no longer fighting to protect their own children. This fight continues for the sake of ALL current and future third graders. Prevailing in this case will also help to chip away at both the “A+ Plan” and “school grades.”

Is there any other reason why the FLDOE and the 5 districts would have 30 (yes, thirty) attorneys working on this case against a single attorney for the plaintiffs?

Below are the key issues about the 3rd Grade Retention Lawsuit and why the families are now focused on getting their case to the Florida Supreme Court

(The chronology of this lawsuit are listed below)…

62 of the 67 Florida districts DID follow the law and promoted students by alternative assessments where it was appropriate – including a teacher-portfolio meeting state guidelines. Only the 5 districts in the lawsuit (Hernando, Orange, Osceola, Pasco and Seminole) are still insisting that in order to be promoted, they must have either a passing FSA score, or another test, which is what the parents refused, as was their right, under Florida Law.

WHAT IS AT STAKE NOW
Because the DCA ruled against plaintiffs on venue, they must now either –

a) go back to each of the 5 districts to get their case heard, or
b) ask Florida Supreme Court to overturn the ruling on venue so that the case can go back to Judge Gievers Court to be heard on the merits of the case.

If the DCA’s ruling on venue is allowed to stand, the implications go much farther than education – If individuals in multiple districts have a valid complaint against state policy, they would now be made to take it up with their local courts and would be refused the efficiency of joining each case to that of other plaintiffs experiencing the same situation in other districts.

Fragmenting the plaintiffs’ case and sending them to their local districts will break the case – AND THE DEFENSE KNOWS THIS. This could result in 5 different outcomes – which might not result in systemic change.

To date, the outstanding legal bill is in excess of $60,000. The attorney is only asking for her outstanding expenses to be covered – the $7,400 – in order for the plaintiffs to progress with the case to the Supreme Court of Florida so that the case can be heard.

From the TB Times Aug 26 article following Judge Gievers’ initial ruling FOR the plaintiffs, Judge’s ruling is a blow to Florida’s third-grade testing rules

“Gievers has yet to conduct a full trial on the parents’ over-arching complaint challenging the third-grade retention law.”

Provided by CoolFundraisingIdeas.net

Check back for updates!

It is especially notable that SO MANY educators have donated (some regularly) to this cause. No contribution is too small. You can also help by sharing this post.

There are 3 ways to donate:
1) gofundme.com/StopGr3Retention
2) Paypal link on https://www.facebook.com/TheOptOutFloridaNetwork/
3) To avoid GoFundMe fees, you may send a check directly to the attorney for the Plaintiffs:

The Law Office of Andrea Flynn Mogensen, P.A.
200 South Washington Boulevard, Suite 7
Sarasota, FL 34236

Please note on your check: “Third Grade Florida Supreme Court” and please notify us at TheOptOutFLNetwork@gmail.com

Once we meet this urgent goal, please continue to give generously. There are already other hurdles (legal fees) still to clear.

Thank you VERY MUCH for your support! It is greatly appreciated.

_______________________________________
The Chronology (click on links to articles for details):
July 18 2016: Group seeks support to fight Florida’s third-grade retention law

Tampa Bay Times: 
“”Courageous parents have refused all further testing for purposes of promotion,” according to the Opt Out Florida Network, which is supporting the effort. “They are demanding that their children be promoted based on the work they did all year long, evidenced by satisfactory report cards or actual portfolios of their children’s work (which includes tests done in school) – a more thorough and rigorous evaluation than any single test could possibly be.”

The families have talked with lawyers, and are aiming to get the courts to find the retention law unconstitutional and unenforceable.

If successful, their effort could have widespread effect. Florida’s third-grade retention law has been replicated (in various forms in 15 other states) throughout the country as other states seek to hold schools accountable for student learning.”

Aug 10 2016: The suit is filed in Leon County, where the FLDOE is located.
Aug 2016: Parents file motion for emergency injunctive relief as school year began.
Aug 12 2017: Parents have their first “day in court” – Parents sue when third-grade honors students are not promoted to fourth grade
Aug 26 2016: Favorable outcomes – Judge blasts state, local schools in 3rd-grade retention case
Aug 26 2016:  Judge’s ruling is a blow to Florida’s third-grade testing rules
Aug 29 2016: Judge rules. Plaintiffs prevail, mostly – Judge issues mixed ruling on Florida’s third-grade retention law (Judge Gievers rules overwhelmingly for plaintiffs – orders districts to promote and to use portfolios as parents requested. Says they met minimum requirements for “participation” in testing.)
Aug 29 2016: And yet… Kids who defied Florida’s third-grade testing rules hit roadblocks as they return to school
Aug 30 2017: (Districts) appeal third-grade retention ruling
Sep 2 2016: Editorial: Hernando school district loses lawsuit, punishes kids
Sep 2, 2017: ABC7 Editorial (VIDEO): “Civil disobedience is democracy’s way of saying enough is enough.”
Dec 29 2016: Florida lawmaker files bill to clarify third-grade retention rules
Jan 7, 2017: DCA agree to hear oral arguments on venue.
Feb 7, 2017: District Court of Appeals hears oral arguments – where plaintiffs’ lawyer is prevented from arguing her case, having to contend with off-topic questions and statements from the bench.
Mar 7 2017: District Court of Appeals rules against parents for FLDOE and districts on venue – only.

IMPORTANT NOTE: The DCA ruling on venue does not overturn the merits of Judge Gievers’ ruling – but parents must now seek to overturn the DCA ruling on venue in the Florida Supreme Court… or take it up with their local school districts.

1/7/17 UPDATE – 3rd Grade Lawsuit

Tags

#180DaysCount, Accountability, Florida legislature, FSA Opt Out Movement, High stakes testing, Retention, retention lawsuit, Third Grade FSA, Third Grade lawsuit, Third Grade Promotion

In a Dec 28 update from Andrea Mogensen, Attorney for the plaintiffs:

“Oral argument has been granted. It is scheduled for February 7th at 9 a.m. in the First District Court of Appeals in Tallahassee. Not every case that’s up on appeal is granted oral argument. This case, I am sure, was granted an argument because of its importance.

This is good news, because the case is being giving the weight it deserves.

Most appeals are decided just on the briefs that are submitted. Oral argument is where the attorneys appear and are questioned by Justices of the District Court of Appeals. Judges don’t necessarily ask questions but each party will be given 30 mins to present their argument.

The court will not make its decision at the hearing. It will make its decision in writing sometime thereafter, and there is no way to tell how long it will take after the oral argument is heard for the high court to rule. However, for oral argument this is being set rather quickly.

These court proceedings will be open to the public and will be streamed live on the Florida Channel.”

It will also be streamed live at The First District Court of Appeal’s website.

With the exception of Andrea Mogensen, who represents the plaintiffs, the rest of the names on the list above represent the THIRTY-ONE (yes, 31) attorneys for the FLDOE and the five school districts defending this lawsuit – Hernando, Pasco, Orange, Osceola and Seminole.

Everyone should be asking – What is the cost to taxpayers for the state and districts to fight a judge’s lawful court order?

Things have been quiet as we have all waited for the suit to proceed. We remain especially grateful to the plaintiff families and their attorneys still embroiled in this lawsuit, fighting mandatory retention in Hernando, Orange, Osceola, Seminole, and Pasco Counties.

In this Florida Channel video – 12/7/16 House “Legislator University” Training: An Overview of School Accountability at about the 25:30 mark, Florida House Rep. Wengay Newton asks for confirmation that all the children retained had been promoted. The correct answer, Sir, is NO, they have not. Since Judge Gievers’ ruling on September 26, only the children from Sarasota and Broward Counties were promoted when their families agreed to withdraw from the suit.

So where are the children?

From August through November, one child from Seminole County, gifted and documented as reading above the 7th grade level LAST YEAR, was forced to repeat the 3rd grade in Seminole County. She is now enrolled in a private school. So that they would not be subjected to the psychological and emotional harm of having to repeat a year of 3rd grade work unnecessarily, the rest of the children are now all being either homeschooled, or enrolled in private schools at considerable expense.

We eagerly await the ruling of the Appellate Court so that the lawsuit can proceed in earnest. We remain hopeful for systemic change.

In the meantime, please continue to support the effort to make #180DaysCount with your generous donation to the legal fund: https://www.gofundme.com/StopGr3Retention

Recommended reading: 
Tampa Bay Times – 12/29/16:
Florida lawmaker files bill to clarify third-grade retention rules

Previous updates:
https://theoptoutfloridanetwork.wordpress.com/2016/10/22/mom-in-3rd-grade-lawsuit-addresses-seminole-school-board/

https://theoptoutfloridanetwork.wordpress.com/2016/09/04/904-update-3rd-grade-lawsuit/

https://theoptoutfloridanetwork.wordpress.com/2016/08/10/lawsuit-to-make-180dayscount-is-filed/

https://theoptoutfloridanetwork.wordpress.com/2016/07/20/720-update-3rd-grade-lawsuit/

Courage Is Not Required for Seminole Board To Do The Right Thing

Tags

#180DaysCount, alternative assessment, authentic classrooms, bullying, developmentally Appropriate Practice, FLDOE, Florida legislature, FSA, FSA Opt Out Movement, Good Cause Exemptions, harmful educational practices, High stakes testing, intimidation, promotion by report card, real learning, real teaching, Third grade, Third Grade FSA, Third Grade Promotion

by Sandy Stenoff

At the last Seminole County School Board meeting, parents and teachers provided input about the Third Grade lawsuit, involving Seminole County students. After Jodi Parham read for Rhonda Nickerson (at 58:00), the board stated (at 1:01:35) that they would typically not accept public comments about pending litigation. The attorney for SCPS provided a brief update on the lawsuit to the board (at 1:02:05).

My speech was cut short (Video from 1:04:15 to 1:06:58).

The next day, I sent my complete address, with references, to the board to be entered into the record:

Dear Drs. Calderone and Griffin, 

 

Thank you for the opportunity to address you yesterday evening.  Had I been permitted to complete my statement, this is what I would have shared with you. While I do understand that the district may not be able to comment publicly on pending litigation, I would put forth, respectfully, that the public certainly has the right to provide comment – of course, with no expectation that the board would respond publicly. I sincerely hope that you will give this serious consideration. Other districts have successfully worked with parents in the lawsuit. 

 

I appreciate that this will be added to the record of yesterday’s meeting. Thank you for your consideration.

Sincerely,
Sandy Stenoff

_____________________

I’m here today, because of two proficient children from Seminole in the lawsuit, who are still officially retained in the third grade simply because they have no test score, against the Judge’s order and against Florida education statutes.

The parents requested early in the school year to have a portfolio compiled, as the law allows. The state statute as well as numerous publications from the DOE state:

“A parent of a student in grade 3 who is identified anytime during the school year as being at risk of retention may request that the school immediately begin collecting evidence for the portfolio.”

They were denied.

I believe there must be a disconnect in the district’s understanding of what a portfolio is. State statute, FLDOE TAP reports and Just Read Florida state that “Portfolio Evidence is to include multiple choice items.”

Nowhere does it say that a portfolio must be made up exclusively of multiple choice test items.  A real portfolio, which meets the state guidelines, as Sarina Nickerson’s portfolio does, is without question, a more through and rigorous measure of her teacher’s and this district’s accountability than any single test.  It should be held up as an example for all. Instead, it is dismissed, as was this student’s educational rights.

Currently, Sarina must be homeschooled for her own protection from the actions of this district.  Fortunately for her, her family is able to do this. Camryn Weaver is not so lucky. She is gifted, and reads above the 6^th grade level. She is in 4^th grade math, but 3^rd grade for everything else. The law dictates strict parameters for how a retained student must be remediated. If that were happening for Camryn Weaver, she would not be repeating third grade work right now. That she is in 4^th grade math tells me that the district has the authority to be flexible. It was also the district’s legal option to place her in a 4^th grade class, pending a mid year promotion, but that is not happening either (See References – Attached is an e-mail excerpt from the FLDOE to Senator Darren Soto attesting that this is an acceptable course of action).

Her mother tells me that Camryn now says things like, “I’m just stupid.” (I did not state this at the meeting, as Camryn was in the audience, but it is what she now says, where she never did before.)What have we become when children need protection from public education?

I have watched every minute of the 9-hour evidentiary hearing and I have read Judge Gievers’ 53-page ruling numerous times.  In a nutshell, the judge’s ruling overwhelmingly found for the plaintiffs – the main points being:

– That they had the right to request a teacher-compiled portfolio over one based on tests – Page 19 Item 32 *

– Promotion is not to be based solely on a test or tests. Page 13, Item 18 **

– Districts are ordered to stop refusing to allow a portfolio Page 14, Item 19 ***

And finally, regarding the automatic stay as a result of the district appealing the venue, from the Tampa Bay Times – Sept 13:

Judge Gievers:

“To the extent that the evidence and law warranted the provision of injunctive relief as to the State Education Defendants and the School Board of Hernando County, the automatic stay of the order as to the challenged injunctive relief *does not authorize the Defendants to ignore the mandatory provisions of the statutes in question*.”

Research consistently shows that students are better off being promoted and provided the intervention and support they need. The short term gains in improved test scores in the 4^th grade, are outstripped by the long-term harm of retention. I ask you to consider this for each child as you go forward. By law, retention decisions are never supposed to be made on the sole basis of a test score, but that is exactly what has happened to these children. Parents are supposed to be included in these decisions. If the children are simply collateral damage, please ask yourselves, To what end?

I have met with some of you personally and I believe you when you say that, as a district, you put children and teachers first. You have said that your hands were tied because you were obligated to follow the law. The Judge’s court order has untied them now.  Just a year and a half ago, when the law about minimal participation was unclear, you led the way with your courageous decisions to treat children ethically and with respect (here and here). Districts across the state followed your lead. The law is clear now. Courage is not required, only the will to do right by these children.

Please restore our trust that this district puts children first.

It isn’t part of the educator’s creed to “First do no harm”, but it should be.

I will leave you with this quote from over 2,400 years ago by Aristotle:
“What it lies in our power to do, it lies in our power not to do.”

_________________

10/22/16 – Ft Lauderdale Sun Times
Broward promotes twins who opted out of state test

08/11/16 Sarsota Herald Tribune
Sarasota School District relents, advances 3rd grade student
________________

REFERENCES
Judge Gievers’ 53-page ruling from Aug 26 2016: http://goo.gl/aeFvOL

* Page 19, Item 32 The Plaintiff may pursue administrative proceedings regarding her preference for a teacher-compiled portfolio based on school work completed in the year to one based on standards assessment testing, if she wishes.

** Page 13, Item 18 The School Board and State Education Defendants had no right to ignore the legislatively adopted portfolio option. No statute limits promotion to grade 4 solely to tests; the Legislature has made clear that the portfolio option is an alternate option that is still available to all of Florida’s children. Section 1008.25(5}, Florida Statutes.

*** Page 14, Item 19 Accordingly, the Hernando County School Board is ORDERED to immediately refrain from further actions contrary to the availability of the portfolio option, and is ORDERED to immediately provide the portfolio option, at minimum, to any parent who has requested one or who requests one going forward.
_________________

Pages 5-6: http://www.fldoe.org/core/fileparse.php/7539/urlt/2013thirdgradeprogressiontap.pdf

STUDENT PORTFOLIOS FOR THIRD-GRADE STUDENTS

B-1. Why would a teacher use a student portfolio?
Section 1008.25(6)(b)4., F.S., states that a student who scores a Level 1 on the grade 3 statewide FSA-ELA may be promoted to fourth grade if the student demonstrates through a student portfolio that the student is performing at least at Level 2 on the statewide standardized assessment.

B-2. When should the teacher and students begin the third-grade student portfolio?
A parent of a student in grade 3 who is identified anytime during the school year as being at risk of retention may request that the school immediately begin collecting evidence for the portfolio.

B-3.  Are there guidelines provided by the state for the third-grade student portfolio?
Yes. As provided in the updated Rule 6A-1.094221, F.A.C., to be accepted as meeting the portfolio option for demonstrating mastery of the required reading skills, the student portfolio must:

•Be selected by the student’s teacher;
•Be an accurate picture of the student’s ability and only include student work that has been independently produced in the classroom;
•Include evidence that the standards assessed by the grade 3 statewide English Language Arts assessment have been met. Evidence is to include multiple choice items and passages that are approximately 60 percent literary text and 40 percent information text that are between 100-700 words with an average of 500 words. Such evidence could include chapter or unit tests from the district’s/school’s adopted core reading curriculum that are aligned with the Language Arts Florida Standards or teacher-prepared assessments;
•Be an organized collection of evidence of the student’s mastery of the Language Arts Florida Standards that are assessed by the grade 3 statewide English Language Arts assessment. For each standard, there must be at least three examples of mastery as demonstrated by a grade of 70 percent or above on each example; and
•Be signed by the teacher and the principal as an accurate assessment of the required reading skills. Additionally, note that the Just Read, Florida! Office has begun creating an updated Third- Grade State Portfolio.

B-4.  Do the same portfolio guidelines apply to ESE students?
Yes. The state portfolio guidelines apply to all students, including ESE students.

B-5.  Is the student portfolio the only tool used for good cause exemption and/or promoting a third-grade student to fourth grade in the middle of the year?
No. The student portfolio and an alternative assessment are the two state-approved options for good cause exemption and mid-year promotion. The student must be offered both options. However, the student must only demonstrate proficiency on one of the options in order to receive a good cause exemption or be promoted midyear.

B-6.  If a teacher is monitoring the progress of a student, is a portfolio needed?
Yes. A portfolio provides ongoing information on how a student is performing on tested benchmarks. There are specific requirements of necessary elements that must be included in a portfolio used for promotion (please refer to question B-3 of this document for the requirements). If a teacher chooses to follow the rigor of the state portfolio requirements, a portfolio may be used for progress monitoring as well as promotion.

___________________

Excerpt of e-mail from Suzan Shaw at FLDOE to Senator Darren Soto – July 12, 2016
asserting that 4th grade placement with mid-year promotion is an allowable option.

____________________

Page 10: http://www.fldoe.org/core/fileparse.php/7539/urlt/2013thirdgradeprogressiontap.pdf

E-3.  Can a third-grade student, potentially eligible for mid-year promotion, be placed in a fourth-grade classroom and then promoted after demonstrating proficiency on the portfolio or an alternative assessment?
Yes. Districts need to meet the individual needs of students. This can be achieved through implementing creative multi-age grouping or a transitional-classroom setting.

E-4.  Why would a decision be made about a student’s placement during the first semester of the academic year?
Students should be promoted midyear or as soon as possible so they receive essential fourth- grade instruction. For example, if a student has attended a Summer Reading Camp and demonstrated mastery of all benchmarks but one, the student could show proficiency in the deficit benchmark and then be promoted to fourth grade. Any student meeting specified state requirements may be promoted midyear.

E-5.  How many samples of proficiency are required for each benchmark in order for a student to be promoted midyear?
In any given school year, a student must have three examples of each benchmark successfully completed on the third-grade level, with a score of 70 percent or above on each example, in order to be promoted midyear. Rule 6A-1.094222, F.A.C. 

Failing to implement a mid-year promotion, will the district adhere to the letter of the law here (below), as it pertains to students retained without any documented reading deficiency? And – Is this happening for ALL students who have been retained?

F.S. 1008.25(7)

(7) SUCCESSFUL PROGRESSION FOR RETAINED THIRD GRADE STUDENTS. —
(a) Students retained under the provisions of paragraph (5)(b) must be provided intensive interventions in reading to ameliorate the student’s specific reading deficiency, as identified by a valid and reliable diagnostic assessment. This intensive intervention must include effective instructional strategies, participation in the school district’s summer reading camp, and appropriate teaching methodologies necessary to assist those students in becoming successful readers, able to read at or above grade level, and ready for promotion to the next grade. (Camryn Weaver has no reading deficiency. Wekiva Elementary has already demonstarted that she reads at near 7th grade level)

(b) Each school district shall:

1. Provide third grade students who are retained under the provisions of paragraph (5)(b) with intensive instructional services and supports to remediate the identified areas of reading deficiency, including participation in the school district’s summer reading camp as required under paragraph (a) and a minimum of 90 minutes of daily, uninterrupted, scientifically research-based reading instruction which includes phonemic awareness, phonics, fluency, vocabulary, and comprehension and other strategies prescribed by the school district, which may include, but are not limited to:
a. Integration of science and social studies content within the 90-minute block.
b. Small group instruction.
c. Reduced teacher-student ratios.
d. More frequent progress monitoring.
e. Tutoring or mentoring.
f. Transition classes containing 3rd and 4th grade students.
g. Extended school day, week, or year.

2. Provide written notification to the parent of a student who is retained under the provisions of paragraph (5)(b) that his or her child has not met the proficiency level required for promotion and the reasons the child is not eligible for a good cause exemption as provided in paragraph (6)(b). The notification must comply with the provisions of s. 1002.20(15) and must include a description of proposed interventions and supports that will be provided to the child to remediate the identified areas of reading deficiency.

3. Implement a policy for the midyear promotion of a student retained under the provisions of paragraph (5)(b) who can demonstrate that he or she is a successful and independent reader and performing at or above grade level in reading or, upon implementation of English Language Arts assessments, performing at or above grade level in English Language Arts. Tools that school districts may use in reevaluating a student retained may include subsequent assessments, alternative assessments, and portfolio reviews, in accordance with rules of the State Board of Education. Students promoted during the school year after November 1 must demonstrate proficiency levels in reading equivalent to the level necessary for the beginning of grade 4. The rules adopted by the State Board of Education must include standards that provide a reasonable expectation that the student’s progress is sufficient to master appropriate grade 4 level reading skills.

4. Provide students who are retained under the provisions of paragraph (5)(b) with a highly effective teacher as determined by the teacher’s performance evaluation under s. 1012.34.

5. Establish at each school, when applicable, an Intensive Acceleration Class for retained grade 3 students who subsequently score Level 1 on the required statewide, standardized assessment identified in s. 1008.22. The focus of the Intensive Acceleration Class shall be to increase a child’s reading and English Language Arts skill level at least two grade levels in 1 school year. (In order to be in compliance, the district would have to expect Camryn Weaver to achieve reading at the 8th grade level by year end.)

The Intensive Acceleration Class shall:

a. Be provided to a student in grade 3 who scores Level 1 on the statewide, standardized English Language Arts assessment and who was retained in grade 3 the prior year because of scoring Level 1.
b. Have a reduced teacher-student ratio.
c. Provide uninterrupted reading instruction for the majority of student contact time each day and incorporate opportunities to master the grade 4 Next Generation Sunshine State Standards in other core subject areas.
d. Use a reading program that is scientifically research-based and has proven results in accelerating student reading achievement within the same school year.
e. Provide intensive language and vocabulary instruction using a scientifically research-based program, including use of a speech-language therapist.

ADDITIONAL
SCPS FSA Q & A 022515 (2014-2015)
State portfolio guidelines are clearly outlined here as well.

How to Request a 3rd Grade Portfolio

Tags

#180DaysCount, good cause exemption, Judge Gievers, Karen Gievers, Parent Action, parents refuse testing, Portfolio, Portfolio assessment, promotion by portfolio, Third grade, Third Grade Promotion

by Sandy Stenoff

I recently posted a checklist for a statutory portfolio, created by certified teachers, that meets the State’s requirements for a portfolio assessment, using not a series of test bank items, but third grade classwork, which, by the way, includes tests.

What’s going on right now?
Many schools have been welcoming and accommodating, but others have resisted and even pushed back. Some schools have gone so far as to declare that students with no prior history of reading difficulty suddenly have a reading deficiency…. OK… isn’t this the perfect reason why a portfolio should be maintained?

Like many others, I’ve successfully opted my ten and twelve year old children out of testing for the past four years, without incident. The path will be much clearer after the judge rules on the state’s and districts’ appeals and we are all anxious for resolution, but in the meantime, here are some suggestions:

STEP 1:
Develop a relationship of respect with your child’s teacher. It will go a long way to
fostering mutual trust all year long. Necessary. Your request for a portfolio can wait until AFTER Open House. There is too much going on at Open House and you need to have a one-on-one conversation.

AFTER Open House, email and ask for a brief meeting, before or after school to address some concerns and observations.

Print this brief letter out, bring it with you to give it to the teacher at your meeting. E-mail a copy to the teacher and principal after the meeting to maintain a record of your request.

Date:

Dear Ms. Crabtree,

I have concerns about (name)’s performance on testing, which could put him at risk of retention. I am therefore asking respectfully, that a portfolio of classwork be maintained for him.

In order to make this as simple as possible for you, I have attached a sample Third Grade Portfolio Checklist with Portfolio Instructions that meets the state’s portfolio requirements. Other teachers have found it extremely helpful.

Thank you, in advance for your kind cooperation. Please let me know if I can be of assistance to you and if you have any questions. We’re looking forward to a great year in your class!

Sincerely,

That’s it.
____________

Your own checklist of items to print and bring with you to meeting:

1. Brief letter requesting portfolio – 2 signed and dated copies
2. Third Grade Portfolio Checklist 2016-2017
3. Third Grade Portfolio Instructions 2016-2017

Step 2: The meeting 
Be respectful of the teacher (and students). Be on time. You can be frank and let the teacher know that you see and feel a lot of emphasis put on making sure the kids pass a test that isn’t even for another seven months. Tell her you have concerns that although your child is a good student, that you are concerned that he isn’t consistently a great test-taker and one bad day could be a disaster, putting him at risk of retention, so you are requesting that she, please, maintain a portfolio.

Present your letter and let her know that it is not your intention to create more work for her, so you have taken the liberty to share the portfolio checklist with her. The extra copy of the letter is for the principal.

You can choose to discuss opting out of the test or not at this time. I would suggest that unless you feel the teacher will be supportive, that you hold off on this, as long as you know that a portfolio will be maintained, you got what you came for. There is plenty of time to notify the teacher and school that you will be opting out.

If you feel you must advise the school about opting out, let them know that you have done your homework and have considered this carefully. You are taking a stand because you see how testing drives everything in school.

Let the teacher know that you trust her professional judgment and ability to teach and assess your child on a daily basis, far more then you trust a single test on a single day to tell you if your child is learning and developing appropriately and whether your child is fit for promotion or not.

Step 3: If your request for a portfolio is refused.
No need to raise the specter of opting out just yet. If the teacher or principal still resist the portfolio after this, then you can go into more detail.

“To clarify – if you are refusing to maintain a portfolio for Matthew, I’d like to point out that per FS 1008.25(5)(c)7.,

“…A parent of a student in grade 3 who is identified anytime during the year as being at risk of retention may request that the school immediately begin collecting evidence for a portfolio.”

In the interest of making sure that Matthew is able to demonstrate mastery of the standards at the end of the year, please let me know if I can be of help in organizing his portfolio.

Thank you for your understanding.”

This also applies if the school tells you that the portfolio tests are the only acceptable portfolio. It simply isn’t true.

Step 4: Maintaining your own portfolio at home
If you choose not to fight the school and want to compile your child’s portfolio, then you will still need to collect ALL work completed at school to get it all organized.

“As you are not maintaining a student portfolio for Matthew, as I requested, I am formally requesting that you notate the standard(s) assessed on each assignment completed in class and return to me weekly, so that I may keep a portfolio that will demonstrate that he is fit for promotion at the end of the year.”

If you are maintaining the portfolio, all you need is a 3-ring binder and a few dividers. Separate the work into subjects (Language Arts, Math, Science and Social Studies) and save them in date order.
____________

The threat of retention can cause anxiety for many families, but I’d like to ask you to put yourself in the teacher’s shoes for a moment. A curt, demanding letter from a parent can be intimidating and is, at the very least, off-putting. It’s possible for this process to take a few weeks of communicating back and forth, especially if the school invokes the powers of the district. It could be a very simple one time conversation, but it could also be challenging. Be patient. If you start early, you should have ample time.

Help and support are always available to you at Opt Out Florida Third Grade.

NOTE
Many teachers are still unaware that districts were taken to task by Judge Gievers for not doing a portfolio as parents requested early on. They may be unaware that going forward, such refusal may be considered a violation of Judge Gievers’ Court Order.

Feel free to print out these sections of the Judge’s ruling for your child’s teacher if you feel you need the back up:

Summary of Rulings #18, p 13 of 51

Summary of Rulings #40, p 24-25 of 51

Rulings #5, p 49 of 51

This may be all that’s needed, though I’d hate to start the year off this way. Based on your relationship with the teacher, it’s a judgement call on your part.

Try to keep it as simple and as cordial as possible. You CAN assume the best and give teachers and staff the benefit of the doubt, unless they prove you wrong.  There is no need to put anyone on the defensive. Smile.

YES – How can we work together in the best interests of my child?
NO  – Why won’t you do this for me?

Consider for just a moment, that most teachers are not even aware of “Activist World.” Most teachers stay up late grading tests and assignments, working on lesson plans, answering emails from PARENTS. Many teachers sacrifice precious personal time with their own families so that they can do their best for other people’s children.

So parents, please think twice before storming the castle, waving the judge’s orders and demanding portfolios. Parents absolutely have a right to ask for, and to receive a portfolio. But let’s first think of how we can help teachers to understand that we want to work WITH them, that we are doing this because we have more faith in them than we do in a single high stakes test and we support them as the experts.

Teachers should be aware that you are HELPING to make sure that your child is promoted, not retained, which one would also assume could ultimately affect his/her evaluation.

Until now, I have felt that some of the most successful opt outs are done quietly in schools, where there is no disruption caused to your child’s classmates and school.

But is DISRUPTION what is needed to cause an entire paradigm shift?

Disruption in your child’s school (not OK) is different from disruption in the community (very OK).  Disruption doesn’t have to be “in your face” with your school. It can be simply you sharing what you know everywhere. It can look like this car in the carpool line every day. This one happens to belong to a former teacher.

Or it could look like a parent sharing Opt Out flyers at Saturday soccer. (Updated flyers will be available soon after the judge rules on the state’s appeal.)

Disruption could also look like parents addressing genuine concerns at public school board meetings. We must hold those in positions of authority accountable. We can do that by being a voice for our children with those who make the decisions affecting our children’s daily experience in school. If parents are to have an authentic voice in their child’s education, they must not only be informed, but they must help others to be informed as well. That includes school board members, legislators, etc. When you inform them at board meetings and legislative delegation meetings, it’s a public record and you take away their ability to claim, “I didn’t know.”

If we are to take our classrooms back for real teaching and learning, imagine this…

If your child’s teacher knew that none of her students would be taking the FSA, what would be the point of ANY test prep? She would be free to teach authentically and your child would be free to LEARN. Imagine just one classroom like this all year long. Now, imagine all classrooms like this, all year long, across our entire state.

When I asked my son’s teacher to do a portfolio a few years ago, she said it was no problem, because she had already started to do it for a few kids in class, who she felt were struggling. This is nothing new. It has been done, is being done and you have a right to ask. So ask. Nicely.

9/04 UPDATE – 3rd Grade Lawsuit

Tags

#180DaysCount, Accountability, alternative assessment, authentic classrooms, developmentally Appropriate Practice, FLDOE, Florida legislature, FSA, Good Cause Exemptions, High stakes testing, K-12, Opt Out, opt out movement, promotion by report card, real learning, state bullying, The Opt Out Florida Network, Third grade, Third Grade FSA, Third Grade lawsuit

Since last week Friday, August 26, when Judge Gievers ruled most favorably for the plaintiffs in the third grade lawsuit, it feels like we’ve been on a rollercoaster. As soon as the judge’s ruling was made public, Orange County filed their prepared appeal, to which OCPS legal counsel referred many times during the course of the nine hour hearing at the beginning of that week. Soon after, Hernando, Broward and Seminole Counties followed suit.

In effect, these districts are opting out of following the judge’s ruling and court order. The public may want to know who is funding these appeals, which have disappointed many, but surprised few.  Parent, Jinia Parker wrote a stinging and stellar open letter to Florida school boards,

“I will not accept “our hands are tied” ever again. Throughout history, “I was following orders” has been the excuse of cowards and those who lack honor. I’m not asking for anything extraordinary. I am asking that school boards in Florida do the right thing.”

Last week, three of the children in the suit from Hernando County, who had their rights upheld by the Court, showed up eager to start school in the fourth grade, as Judge Gievers had ordered. In a brazen and cruel move, Chocachatti Elementary School told the children they could go to the fourth grade, just not there. Details are spelled out here, here and in the Tampa Bay Times editorial below, but suffice it to say that if the school had followed the law in the first place, the children would have been promoted in June and there would be no reason for them to file a lawsuit. Their parents would not have had to protect them from the emotional abuse of repeating a grade, out of which they had earned their way the year before.

The two Seminole County families were directed by the judge, to first seek administrative relief with their district. Seminole County Public Schools told the parents that their children would be promoted IF they take and pass the same test items to make up a portfolio or the IOWA, both of which they had refused before… Stalemate.

So did the judge say they could go to the fourth grade or not?

There has been some confusion surrounding the Third Grade families’ lawsuit and the attached motion for injunctive relief.

First, this case is not over. The motion for relief was just the first step, that had to be addressed before the suit can get under way.

The families are challenging the Florida Statutes and how the FLDOE and school boards are applying the statutes to disadvantage the children and children across Florida.  The State is failing to apply the exemptions provided in the statutes. They are retaining children just for non-performance on testing in violation of State law. The Court ruled favorably to the families on many of these issues and if you have read the ruling, you know what they are.

So why doesn’t it feel like the children are winning?  Why are the children still in 3rd grade?

The children ARE winning… but the process takes time.

Here is what is happening:

Attorney Mogenson asked for emergency relief on behalf of each child.  Judge Gievers granted relief only to some, in spite of the request.  This may not have been clear, because the judge did not allow for closing arguments.  The emergency relief sought is promotion to the 4th grade, based on report cards.  The judge, while favorable to our point of view, felt that the LAW limited her as far as EMERGENCY relief.  So she gave some relief (but not all that was asked for) to some of the children.  These issues will also be addressed in the trial ahead.  Her ruling stated clearly, however, that she saw violations of the law, for which relief cannot yet be granted.

Second, one problem for the families is that the order that is in place right now is not yet enforceable.  While districts could voluntarily comply, since it has been pointed out to them what the law is, the decision to enter the order is the subject of an appeal which stays (or puts on hold) the enforcement of the order and additional proceedings.

Mogensen has petitioned the trial court to lift this stay and the court’s decision about this is currently pending.  The judge will either lift the stay and the order will become effective, or the families will have to wait for the end of the appeal and our hope is that the families would prevail on appeal.  Assuming that one of those things happens, the order would then become immediately effective.

And finally, this battle is far from over, but it is a battle. And it will be a costly one.Public support will be crucial to keep it going. Remember that only the request for emergency relief has been ruled on.  The lawsuit, as a whole, has not even been presented in court as yet.

The amount of work for this case is enormous, because there are so many families, so many facts, and so many different district responses – layers of laws that are not being followed.  In addition, there are multiple lawyers for each defendant on the other side, who are all spending hours (and public resources) filing challenges to everything.  Many of the challenges have been of an emergency nature, which has required emergency responses.

The court of public opinion seems, overwhelmingly, to be in our favor.  We are all anxious to see results for the children and for decisions that will have far-reaching implications. We encourage everyone to remain patient and remain supportive as this unfolds. The families and attorneys are doing important work that could benefit all children.  They are committed to seeing this through and are in it for the long haul.  The Court seems inclined to agree with our point of view.

Public awareness of the lawsuit is growing, both statewide and nationally. Social groups and news networks are picking it up. Parents are discussing it in grocery lines and on the soccer sidelines. This victory with the motion granted and the judge’s stern rebuke of the state and districts’ utter manipulation of the law to their own ends has been a thing to see.

Many parents have shared with us that, because of this lawsuit, they now believe there is more reason than ever to push for change. We are steadily chipping away at madness that has been high stakes standardized testing.

We have received so much feedback from the public about the lawsuit. We wanted to share this in particular, from a retired lawyer to the plaintiffs:

“I am a “mommy-retired” lawyer, and this sort of “bury them with motions” crap makes me ill. Good luck with everything. Don’t let them push you all around. Opposing counsel are about winning, which is the name of the game in law (and they are doing their jobs, sadly); however, the DOE is failing to consider the optics here. How does it look to the parents of this state that the department our tax dollars support is playing hard ball with third/fourth graders and their parents?? Bad, bad move, DOE. 

Thank you all so very much for taking this on for the rest of the state. Seriously. Thank you. We are indebted to you for the heartaches of your children, the headaches of the legal process, the money, the time, etc. Please know that there are people watching this with gratitude and prayers for a positive outcome for all.”

The response from one of the plaintiff families:

“I have to tell you this made me cry. Because of everything we have gone through with this fight, I have questioned my decision to fight nearly by the hour. I am trying to teach our child…we can do hard things…we can face challenges with poise and dignity by always doing what we believe is right and just, even when it’s hard…even when there are bullies. Thank you for your support.”

Media coverage has consistently reported the public’s frustration with the DOE (even school districts’ own frustration with them) and about our outrage over how some of the plaintiff children continue to be mistreated by their school districts and their schools, even after the judge’s ruling.

We all rely on the press to hold our government agencies accountable to us, the public.  It is reassuring to see the press holding the districts’ and the FLDOE’s feet to the fire.Yesterday alone, the lawsuit garnered two editorials:

From the Tampa Bay Times:

Editorial: Hernando school district loses lawsuit, punishes kids

“Reason flew the coop in Hernando County, to be replaced by cruelty… Florida’s high-stakes testing system is bound for a reckoning. Too many parents don’t trust the tests or don’t agree with the philosophy behind accountability. The opt-out movement is getting louder, and more lawmakers are listening. District officials look like bullies who, unable to defy a judge, picked a weaker target: fourth-graders.”

From Steve Sabato, Director of Community Engagement for ABC7, Sarasota:
“Civil disobedience is democracy’s way of saying enough is enough.”

We couldn’t agree more.

Please donate to support the legal fund: https://www.gofundme.com/StopGr3Retention

On behalf of the families, thank you for your continued generosity and encouragement.

 

Open Letter to Florida School Boards

Tags

#180DaysCount, Accountability, alternative assessment, authentic classrooms, BPS, Broward Public Schools, bullying, developmentally Appropriate Practice, FLDOE, FSA, Good Cause Exemptions, harmful educational practices, HCSD, Hernando Public Schools, High stakes testing, intimidation, Judge Karen Gievers, K-12, Making kids cry, OCPS, opt out movement, Orange County Public Schools Broward Public Schools, Portfolio assessment, promotion by portfolio, promotion by report card, real teaching, Retention, retention lawsuit, SCPS, Seminole Public Schools, state bullying, Teachers, The Opt Out Florida Network, Third grade, Third Grade FSA

For years, school boards have been telling parents how much they sympathized and empathized with us, as we have pleaded and protested to make a year of school count for more than one test.  There are districts doing right by the children and promoting them, as the law specifies. However, immediately following Judge Gievers’ ruling last Friday, effectively “untying the hands” of all school districts in Florida to do as parents have requested and use a portfolio assessment (not the same as the state’s portfolio test bank), Orange and Hernando Counties filed their already prepared appeals. It’s clear now, that the boards’ chants of, “Our hands are tied” were just excuses to not do better. Sadly, yesterday, Broward and Seminole Counties followed suit, in defiance of the judge’s orders.

In response to the districts’ motions for appeal, this “Open Letter to Florida School Boards” was penned by parent activist, Jinia Parker of Pinellas County. We couldn’t have said it better and we are sharing it here with permission:
____________________

Dear Florida School Boards,

Parents, educators and activists have reached out to you for years, asking for your help and guidance. Again and again we got the same messages.

“Our hands are tied.”
“We must follow the law.”
“We wish we could do things differently, but…”

The order issued last week by a Florida Court finally freed those hands completely as the judge’s order made it clear that the districts had not been following the law (as directed by the purposely absent hand of the FLDOE).

I waited for the celebration from the districts. Finally! Those hands were freed and with them, so too, our kids. Finally! School boards were free to follow the statutes plain language AND with the support of the court. Finally! You could authorize superintendents and principals to promote all those proficient students to fourth grade, saving tax dollars & reducing the harm already done to them under your authority. Finally! School boards could recognize, as it was demonstrated plainly in court, that the FLDOE does not have your back. Finally! The focus of school districts would be our students, not serving the illegal mandates of the FLDOE.

That isn’t what happened.

First, Orange County Public Schools appealed the judge’s ruling, followed by Hernando, Broward, and sadly, Seminole Counties. The FLDOE’s appeal is expected, but I’d rather the districts hadn’t raced them to do so.  Though it shows us who is who.

This speaks volumes about those districts, demanding free hands to continue harm against students. If you think parents won’t be aware, you are wrong. I believe the impeachment of any elected official, seeking to continue harm to children by refusing to follow a court order is not only appropriate, but the only appropriate action. I’m asking that they resign right now. I have little hope of that, given the complete lack of honor with which these districts (and therefore school Boards) have approached the last school year (and more) on this subject.

I will not accept “our hands are tied” ever again. Throughout history, “I was following orders” has been the excuse of cowards and those who lack honor.

I’m not asking for anything extraordinary. I am asking that school boards in Florida do the right thing.

These families, including children, chose to be honorable and brave. You should try it.

Out of patience,

Jinia Parker
#180DaysCount
__________________

==>> TAKE ACTION:
Use #180DaysCount
Tweetable link: bit.ly/Ltr2FLSB
@BrowardSchools
@HernandoSchools
@OCPSNews
@SCPSInfo
@EducationFL
@BetterSchoolsFL
@FLGovScott
@FloridaEA
@FloridaPTA